Pegasus Assets Reconstruction Private Limited v. District Magistrtae

CWP-6604 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-6604 of 2026 Date of decision: 06.03.2026 PEGASUS ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED ....Petitioner V/S DISTRICT MAGISTRTAE, PANIPAT AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY, JUDGE

Present:

Ms. Deepika Mittal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. **** SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral) 1.

The present writ petition has been filed by petitioner/Bank aggrieved by non-execution of the order dated 31.03.2023 (Annexure P-3) passed by the District Magistrate, Panipat, under the provisions of Section 14 Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act for brevity).

1.1 It is informed that S.A. No. 19 of 2026 is pending before the Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Chandigarh.

2.

It is rather surprising that Tehsildar/Naib Tehsildar, Panipat and Superintendent of Police, Panipat i.e. respondents no. 2 and 3 have failed to discharge their statutory duty of assisting and handing over physical possession of the secured asset to the petitioner/Financial Institution. 2.1 Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) are a huge burden on the public exchequer, banking and financial system, and, thus, prompt enforcement of recovery mechanism under the SARFAESI Act is paramount for liquidity in the system.

3.

In view of the above, this court by way of writ of mandamus directs respondent nos. 2 and 3 to execute the order dated 31.03.2023 (Annexure P-3) KAMAL GANDHI 2026.03.07 18:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-6604 of 2026 passed u/s 14 of SARFAESI Act by handing over physical possession of the secured asset to the petitioner/Financial Institution as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of 30 days. The petitioner/Financial Institution, thereafter, can proceed to adopt all possible legitimate means to liquidate the secured asset to recover the due amount.

4.

The petition for the time being stands disposed of in the terms aforesaid. Needless to say that the guidelines laid down by Coordinate Bench in Bank of Maharashtra Vs. District Magistrate, Hisar And Others [CWP-70182022 decided on 28.05.2024] be adhered to by the concerned authorities. 5.

We hasten to add that this order shall however be subject to any restraint/ interim/ final order which may have been passed by any judicial forum, in favour of the borrowers/ guarantor/ any aggrieved person, who is party to this lis. 6.

Respondent no. 2 is directed to file a compliance report before the Registry of this Court within 45 days from the date of passing of this order. The Registry shall ensure that, in case any deficiency is found in the compliance report so filed, the matter be placed before the appropriate Bench on the judicial side under IOIN category.

7.

Needless to clarify that this order shall not come in way of any party aggrieved by any recourse/action taken under SARFAESI Act to avail appropriate remedy before DRT/DRAT as per law.

(SHEEL NAGU) CHIEF JUSTICE (SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 06.03.2026 Kamal Gandhi Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No KAMAL GANDHI 2026.03.07 18:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document