Nidhi And Another v. State Of Punjab And Others
CRWP-2507-2024 -12024:PHHC:110867
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-2507-2024 Date of Decision: 28.08.2024 NIDHI AND ANOTHER
...Petitioners
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SHEKHAWAT
Present:
Mr. Kanwaljeet Singh Brar, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. M. S. Bajwa, DAG, Punjab.
Mr. Manik Makkar, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5.
N.S.SHEKHAWAT , J. (Oral) 1.
The petitioners have filed the instant petition with a prayer to direct the respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners and also direct the respondents No.4 to 7 not to interfere in their lives and liberty.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already submitted a representation dated 11.03.2024 (Annexure P-3) to respondent No.2-the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala, District Patiala and he shall be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2 to look into their aforesaid representation.
3.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties. MAMTA 2024.08.29 15:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
CRWP-2507-2024 -22024:PHHC:110867 4.
In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without expressing anything on the merits and claim of the parties, respondent No.2- the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala, District Patiala is directed to depute a senior officer to look into the representation (Annexure P-3) and after seeking a report, he may pass an appropriate orders, in accordance with law. 5.
The parties mentioned in the petition or any other person mentioned in the petition shall be at liberty to take recourse to appropriate law, if any.
6.
With these observations, this petition is disposed of. 28.08.2024 (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) M.Sikka JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking :
Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MAMTA 2024.08.29 15:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment