Inderjit Singh v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M-22348-2017 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl. Misc. No.M-22348 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 24, 2017 Inderjit Singh ......PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

State of Punjab ....RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Rajan Bansal, Advocate for Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

Mr. C.L. Pawar, Sr. D.A.G. Punjab.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.129 dated 06.12.2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 324, 452, 148 read with Section 149 of Indian Penal Code (for short-IPC) and Sections 326 and 325 IPC added later on, at Police Station Ajitwal, District Moga.

Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has joined the investigation and the matter has already been amicably settled. He will supply copy of compromise to the investigating officer. Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Pritam Singh endorses the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner Sachin Mehta 2017.10.24 17:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

CRM-M-22348-2017 -2has joined the investigation and submit that his custodial interrogation is no more required for further investigation.

In view of submission of learned State counsel but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed and order dated 21.06.2017 is made absolute till the presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the police as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against him so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

(iv) that the petitioner will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court, which the trial Court will decide on the basis of evidence collected during investigation.

( SURINDER GUPTA ) October 24, 2017 JUDGE Sachin M.

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Sachin Mehta 2017.10.24 17:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh