Gurjeet Singh v. State Of Punjab
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH (i) CRM No.M-22369 of 2017 (O&M) Gurjeet Singh
...Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Punjab
...Respondent
(ii) CRM No.M-22378 of 2017 (O&M) Binder Kaur and others
...Petitioners
VERSUS
State of Punjab
...Respondent
(iii) CRM No.M-22387 of 2017 (O&M) Akki Devi @ Sona Devi and another
...Petitioners
VERSUS
State of Punjab
...Respondent
Date of Decision: July 04, 2017
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH
Present:
Mr.Arihant Jain, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr.Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, Sr. DAG, Punjab for the respondent-State.
Mr.R.S.Duggal, Advocate for the complainant.
**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.
Vineet Gulati 2017.07.06 09:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh All the above-mentioned cases are taken up together as the
CRM No.M-22369 of 2017 and connected petitions -2same have arisen from same FIR.
Petitioners have filed these petitions under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.104 dated 15.09.2016 under Sections 379, 447, 506, 511, 201, 148 and 149 IPC, registered at Police Station Julkan, District Patiala.
Notice of motion was issued. Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for the complainant appeared and contested the petition. I have heard learned counsel for the parties as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. As per prosecution version, complainant party was in possession as they have taken the possession one day earlier with the police help and cement poles were affixed. About 20 persons including ladies came there and removed those poles.
The petitioners have already joined the investigation. They are not required for custodial interrogation. Nothing is to be recovered from them. No useful purpose will be served by sending them to custody. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and without discussing the facts of the case in minute details and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case, where petitioners are entitled to benefit of grant of anticipatory bail. Therefore, all the petitions are accepted and the orders dated 21.06.2017 passed in all the petitions granting interim bail to the petitioners, are made absolute. July 04, 2017 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Vineet Gulati 2017.07.06 09:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh