Lal Singh v. Harinder Singh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH FAO No. 474 of 2000 DATE OF DECISION :- 13.11.2025 Lal Singh and another ...Appellants

Versus

Harinder Singh and another

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- None for the appellants.

*** VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J. (Oral) 1.

None is present on behalf of the appellants. Notice was issued issued to the parties. Appellant No. 1 was duly served whereas appellant No. 2 is reported to be dead but none has come present on behalf of appellant No. 1. No application has been moved by the LRs of appellant No. 2 to get themselves impleaded. It seems that nobody is interested in pursuing the instant appeal. 2.

In view of the above and given the prevailing circumstances, there seems to be no justification to keep the appeal on the docket, indefinitely. Accordingly, the instant appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution with liberty to the LRs of the appellant, if any to revive the same, if have any grievance from this order, within a period of three months from today. 3.

Since the main appeal stands decided, the miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly.

(VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 13.11.2025 P.Singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARVINDER SINGH 2025.11.14 14:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment