Gagan Wife Of Sh. Lakshay v. State Of Haryana And Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No.M-22370 of 201 (O&M) Date of Decision: June 20, 2017 Gagan ..........PETITIONER(s).
VERSUS
State of Haryana and others ........RESPONDENT(s).
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present:
Mr. Susheel Gautam, Advocate for the petitioner (s).
******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) Heard.
Learned counsel for the petitioner confines the relief claimed in this petition only to the extent that Superintendent of Police, Panipat may be directed to look into the representation (Annexure P-2) made by the petitioner and take appropriate action in accordance with law as on the complaint of petitioner, FIR No.640 dated 25.05.2017 has been registered at Police Station City Panipat but no action has been taken so far. Vide representation (Annexure P-2), the petitioner has requested Superintendent of Police, Panipat to look into the allegations in the FIR and take appropriate action.
Without expressing any opinion on merits, this petition is disposed of with direction to Superintendent of Police, Panipat to look into the representation Annexure P-2 made by petitioner and take appropriate action in accordance with law.
( SURINDER GUPTA ) June 20, 2017 JUDGE Sachin M.
Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether Reportable:
Yes/No Sachin Mehta 2017.06.20 16:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH