Balbir Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others

CRM-A-823-2019 BALBIR SINGH V/S STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Present:

Mr. J.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate, for the applicant. Ms. Pooja Nayar Sharma, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Rishu Garg, Advocate, for respondent No.2. *** CRM-A-823-2019 Counsel for the applicant submits that they have a very good case on merit and there is sufficient evidence on record which is sufficient for conviction of respondents. There is no appreciation of evidence in judgment of acquittal dated 14.05.2018. Counsel appearing for respondents submits that the judgment of acquittal is well reasoned.

Leave to appeal granted.

Registry to assign number to appeal.

Main appeal Heard.

Admitted.

The accused-respondents No.2 and 3, to execute a bond for attendance within two months, undertaking to appear in this Court, in case appeal is allowed. Given above, the accused-respondents No.2 and 3 shall furnish a personal bond of Rs. Twenty five Thousand only (INR 25,000/-), and furnishing one surety for Rs. Twenty five thousand only (INR 25,000/-), to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court/Duty Magistrate. Before accepting the sureties, the concerned Court must satisfy that if the accused fails to appear in Court, then such surety is capable of producing the accused before the Court.

The furnishing of the personal bonds shall be deemed acceptance of the all stipulations, terms, and conditions of this bail order. JYOTI 2026.02.26 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-A-823-2019 -2Registry to communicate this order to the trial Court without any delay. In case of failure of respondents to furnish bond, the concerned Court shall proceed further in accordance with law.

There would be no need for a certified copy of this order for furnishing bonds, and any Advocate for the accused can download this order along with case status from the official web page of this Court and attest it to be a true copy. In case the attesting officer wants to verify the authenticity, such an officer can also verify its authenticity and may download and use the downloaded copy for attesting bonds. It is clarified that no adverse inference shall be drawn against the respondents.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 24.02.2026 jyoti3 JYOTI 2026.02.26 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document