High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/22346/2015dismissed

Denail George & ORS v. Sapna @ Leena

2016-05-30Mr Justice Rajiv Sharma1 pages

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-22346 of 2015 Date of Decision: 30.05.2016 Denail George and others ......Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. M.S.Saini, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate for respondent No. 2.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J(ORAL) Counsel for the petitioners states that compromise was effected before the Mediators.

Counsel for the respondent states that the quashing petition has to be filed after the payment is made on the second motion. Counsel for the petitioners states that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file the petition for quashing on the basis of compromise.

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. (ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE May 30, 2016 Gurpreet GURPREET SINGH 2016.05.31 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh