High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/22479/2017allowed

Bindri @ Gurvinder Singh v. U T Chandigarh

2017-10-24Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CRM-M-22479-2017 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl. Misc. No.M-22479 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 24, 2017 Bindri @ Gurvinder Singh ......PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

U.T. Chandigarh ....RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Vikas Kuthiala, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

Ms. Ashima Mor, APP for UT Chandigarh.

Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate for the complainant.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.85 (wrongly mentioned as 83 in the petition) dated 30.04.2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 506, 452 of Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Sector-11, Chandigarh. Heard.

Learned APP for UT Chandigarh has placed on file photocopy of FIR recorded in this case which shows that FIR No.85 dated 30.04.2017 was registered in this case while the same has been mentioned as FIR No.83 in the petition. The same be read as FIR No.85. Learned APP for UT Chandigarh submits that petitioner has Sachin Mehta 2017.10.24 17:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

CRM-M-22479-2017 -2joined the investigation and after completion of investigation, challan has already been presented in the Court on 29.09.2017. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that parties have entered into a compromise and a petition bearing CRM-M-29644-2017 has been filed seeking quashing of the FIR, which is also fixed for today. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant-injured endorses the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner. Keeping in view the fact that custodial interrogation of petitioner is no more required as challan has already been filed and parties have also entered into amicable settlement, this petition is allowed and order dated 22.06.2017 is made absolute, subject to the condition that petitioner shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date of hearing. In the event of his non-appearance on any date, the trial Court will be competent to cancel his bail and forfeit the bail bond and surety bond and take the petitioner into custody.

( SURINDER GUPTA ) October 24, 2017 JUDGE Sachin M.

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Sachin Mehta 2017.10.24 17:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh