Ajit Jain v. State Of Haryana Etc.




   

 



 

  
 


   !"

#$"% &'

"

"

%'( )'(*+*  $ ' ,&+%!$-$%

'( '*.

%/'% *
0 1#2
 
0203 * * * * Present : Mr. Gurinder S. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak K. Grewal, DAG, Haryana.

Ms. Komal Abrol, Advocate for Mr. Gaurav Mohunta, Advocate for respondent No.2. * * * * 
   
The instant petition is for quashing of FIR No.91 dated 24.06.2010 registered under Sections 181, 420, 465, 467, 468 & 471 read with Section 1205B IPC at Police Station Kalka, District Panchkula and the consequent proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of written compromise arrived at between the parties. Report has been received from learned SDJM, Kalka after statements of the parties were recorded regarding the compromise. Learned SDJM has reported that the compromise is voluntary and without any pressure or coercion. Learned SDJM has also sent copy of the statements of parties.













 Learned counsel for the State on instructions submits that petitioner is the only accused and respondent no.2 is the only aggrieved person in this FIR.

No useful purpose would be served to keep the FIR pending.

In view of the statements and report of the trial Court and the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in




    

      



!

"#, approved by Hon'ble Apex Court in $





      

"

"

 , the instant petition is allowed and the aforesaid FIR and all consequent proceedings conducted on the basis thereof are quashed qua the petitioner.

Needless to say that parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements made in the Court below.


   





















    

 

 

 


 !"

 !"

 !"

 !"

RAJ KUMAR 2015.10.13 12:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document