Onkar Singh v. Jagtar Singh And ANR

2024:PHHC:050955

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CR No.1698 of 2024 Date of Decision:16.04.2024 Onkar Singh .....Revisionist-Petitioner.

Versus

Jagtar Singh and another .....Respondents.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA ***** Present:- Mr. Davinder Singh Khurana and Mr. Satnam Singh, Advocates for the revisionist-petitioner.

MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.(Oral) By filing the instant revision-petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-defendant No.2 has assailed the order (Annexure P-5) passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ambala (for short 'the trial Court') on 01.08.2023 in Civil Suit No.952 of 2023 titled as 'Jagtar Singh vs.Jagmal Singh and anr', whereby the parties had been directed to maintain status-quo qua the alienation and possession of the suit property and he has also laid challenge to the judgment (Annexure P-7) as handed down by learned District Judge, Ambala (for short 'the Appellate Court') on 10.01.2024, dismissing the Civil Misc. Appeal No.90 of 2023, preferred by him against the order Annexure P-5. 2.

However, at the time of assisting the Court, at the preliminary stage, in the present revision-petition, learned counsel for the petitioner YAG DUTT 2024.04.22 12:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CR No.1698 of 2024 -2- 2024:PHHC:050955 submit that the petitioner has already filed his written-statement and Reply to the application (Annexure P-2)filed by respondent No.1-plaintiff under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC for seeking ad-interim injunction in the afore-referred Civil Suit and the said application is still pending adjudication and they restrict their prayer to the issuance of the direction to the trial Court to decide the above-said application (Annexure P-2) at the earliest possible.

3.

Keeping in view the afore-discussed limited prayer as made by learned counsel for the petitioner and without commenting or expressing any opinion on the merits of the above-mentioned Civil Suit and also of the application Annexure P-2, the revision-petition in hand is, hereby, disposed of with a direction to the concerned the trial Court to decide the application under reference, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) April 16, 2024 JUDGE YagDutt Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether Reportable:

No YAG DUTT 2024.04.22 12:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment