Neveen & ORS v. State Of Haryana & ORS
Date of decision: 19th October, 2015 Naveen and others Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others Respondents ! "# $ $ 1.
Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2.
Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.
Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present:
Mr. Atul Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Deepak Sabharwal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Rajesh K. Dhiman, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 6.
$%
# Report dated 29.07.2015 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Gurgaon has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant Kapil, victims namely Santosh, Jyoti, Nisha and Deepak as well as the accused persons namely Naveen, Rupesh, Vikas, Chetan, Rahul, Yogender and Yogesh, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.10.19 17:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court
free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure.
Heard.
In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, the fact that parties belong to the same very area and the offences for which the accused have been hauled up are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the parties and in view of the law laid down in &'() $')*+ , $-(-. /)0(1 ()2 ()-+.3" 3'4')(5 6 and &7/58')2.3 $')*+ ()2 -+.39 , $-(-. /)0(1 ()2 ()-+.3" : 6 3'4')(5 % the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.273 dated 28.06.2015 registered at Police Station Rajendra Park, District Gurgaon under Sections 147/148/323/325/452/506 IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR are quashed. The petition stands allowed in those terms.
$ ;-1.3 <%
RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.10.19 17:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court