Ranjit Singh v. State Of Punjab
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:- 21.02.2025 ....Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present :
Mr. Akram Hussain, Advocate for Mr. Mahir Sood, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Ankit Grewal, DAG Punjab.
***** SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL) By way of present petition preferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C. the petitioner has sought quashing of impugned order dated 30.04.2022 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, SBS Nagar, whereby the petitioner was declared as proclaimed offender in complaint case No.399 (COMA No.4725 of 2013 dated 23.06.2011 titled 'State vs. Gurmukh Singh and others' (later on titled changed to State vs. Ranjit Singh) under Section 18(a)(i) read with Section 17, 17-A, 17-B punishable under Section 27(b)(i), 27(b) and 27(d) and Section 18(c) punishable under Section 28 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.
! " #$
-2- # % " &
!$ " '( ) #$*($+ "
" #
,
!
- ( (
!$+ ( +
! "
#
#
$ % &
'
()
$ &
'
()
"
&
'
()
#
!
* (*"
!
* (*
#
&
'
()
$ +
,
* $ # !
* (*
"
"
- $.
/ * 0 1 2
! 3 4&5 (
*
)! ' 63
+ * 78 #
#
-3-
7
* 78
9 +
1 7) 16 7)
( (
:
; (50<1 *
16 7) ( "
"* 3
& =
>;
:
; & -$ 69$ $9 ? 3 /- ) !3 " * 3
?= 6
$ &
'
()
@ .
/ ( 0 + "
# % 1" % 03.02.2025$ " #$ +
dated 30.04.2022 (Annexure P-1) passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, SBS Nagar
(0 03.02.2025 " 7.
The petition stands allowed.
8.
Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 21.02.2025 S.Sharma(syr) i) Whether speaking/reasoned?
Yes/No ii) Whether reportable?
Yes/No