Anoop Kaur & ANR v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M 22596 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 31.8.2017 ...

Anoop Kaur and another ................Petitioners vs.

State of Punjab .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan Present: Mr. Gurpal Singh Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. K.S. Aulakh, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. ...

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral) It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have since joined the investigation and that the injury attributed to petitioner No.1 Anoop Kaur, is simple in nature, which seat of injury being leg, whereas no injury has been attributed to petitioner No.2 - Kashmir Kaur.

This fact is conceded by the State counsel, contending that as a result of enquiry which was conducted by DSP, Malout, District Sri Muktsar Sahib, petitioner No.1 Anoop Kaur has been found to be innocent and that the petitioners are not required by the police for the purpose of further investigation.

The interim bail granted to the petitioners vide order dated 23.6.2017 is made absolute, subject to fulfillment of conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

The petition in that way is allowed.

( H.S. Madaan ) Judge 31.8.2017 chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No Banita Chugh 2017.08.31 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh