Jagdish v. Narender Driver No. 38

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** FAO-725-2000 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.01.2026 Jagdish .....Appellant Vs.

Narender Driver No.38 .....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- None for the appellant.

Mr. Samrat Malik, Advocate for the respondent.

**** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) In compliance of the previous order, noce was sent to the appellant. The said noce has been received back with the report that he has expired. No applicaon is moved on behalf of the LR of the appellant to be impleaded as LRs.

In these circumstances, it appears that appellant/his LRs are not interested in pursuing the appeal.

Dismissed in default for want of prosecuon.

(DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE January 14, 2026 Neeka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.01.14 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document