Naresh Kumar Goyal v. State Bank Of India And Others
CWP-6441-2024 2024:PHHC:038464
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CWP-6441-2024 Date of decision: 18.03.2024 NARESH KUMAR GOYAL ....PETITIONER Vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:
Mr. Karan Singla, Advocate and Ms. Malvi Aggaral, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate for respondent-SBI.
**** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J (ORAL) 1.
The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 19.02.2024 (Annexure P-7) whereby his claim qua re-calculation of pension has been rejected.
2.
This is second round of litigation. The petitioner, on the earlier occasion, filed CWP-8374-2015 before this Court which came to be disposed of vide order dated 07.08.2023.
3.
The respondent in compliance of aforesaid order of this Court has passed impugned order dated 19.02.2024. The respondent has found that petitioner is getting correct amount of pension, however, he has been further advised to send papers through proper channel in case of further grievance. 4.
Faced with the fact that respondent has advised the petitioner to approach authorities with supporting documents, counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw with liberty to approach authorities. Anju Goel 2024.03.18 17:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
CWP-6441-2024 2024:PHHC:038464 5.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. 18.03.2024 [JAGMOHAN BANSAL] anju JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Anju Goel 2024.03.18 17:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh