Davinder Kaur And ORS v. State Of Punjab And ORS
!
""""
#$#%&#'
()** % ( +(,#'
( ** -&.('#% /-+% -('
01#%$ *****#0.0.
(#%$
2 3 * 4 /
!
" # $ %%%% / * &'(' )
*+,- - ' .
/+/#,/0+1
2
03' " 45 ) 6 7)
0*#- - " *# /*/8,/08 9) " 4 ,0/+,/08 1
2 ,3 ) '
" *5:;
0*#- - , ;
) < " 0 4 " # $ ) )');
)': < =
" 0 4( ( : < 6( " # $ =
>
2
) (' < /#0,,//4
) )( )) ' =
" 0
" # $ ) ( ' ) ) ) ) (
) '
'
) )( )) ' ? ( ') - )= 1=
3 /*/*,//81
2 43 ' " # $) ( ) ) = ?)( )' )) ( ' ) ' : = 9 )'@
) '
) )) 2 ( )
) )
0,/+,//+1
2
*3 ( ) ) 2 )
" # $ 4 ' = - ' ) " 48A0
,//+1;B3 ( 2
'9))- ( ' ,#00,//+1
2 #3 ,,/8,/0/ 1
2 $3( ;
)) ) -) " 00/,8- ,/0/ " 48A0 ,//+
)) ( ('- /4/,,/001
2 +3 C
* >
:; )
" ,
)7) - ) " ,,,4/8,/0*
0*#- - ( /0/+,/0*: ( 7) ( ' ) 40/4,/0$1
2 0/3 )) ' ()' :- # D :; ) ) 7) 1 '
2 ,3 " *#/*/8,/08
0*#- - ) " # $ ( ) '" 06( ( ) '" , <
)) ( ( )
) 6
( ( ) ( .
< $ ) /+/#,/0+ 1
2 03 )) ( 7) ? )
,/&0*&(
))= ( <
0*$ - -)) " 48A0 ,//+ : - "?) ( ;
) ) ( <)
)' <
' )>(
) ()) ' (
' :- 8
'
" 4
- ?
')
) )
6 - )- ) " # $62
9))- '':- (
' :-
0*# 0*$- -
) ) <
) )) ( + D
) )
:
E) -
! "#
$ % &'
(
( ) (
% *
+ , % -./ (
( . ) - (
+ 0 ' . (
(
#
1
+ % (
(
).
(1 &
*
* * &
&2 *1 31 (
( .- 0
1
!
1 --. (
( // *4
1
+ % -- (
(
A ;
)' ) '('
)
'
) -
)
( ) '
' ) 6 )
(
" *
'
) 6 ' )
( '
) ) ( 9>
> - ( )' < (
( <) .
'<
0*$- - '
(
( ( )( ) )'
()(D -
)
" 0 *' ) 0/ > )' )' " # $'
- ( )
' ' ) ) ) (< ';
)
"?) ,0/#,/0+" 44A ,0/#,/0+ (
2 #@4
2 #@4 )' ) .
) ) ?' ' " 4 ' ) 00 D -
)())
) " # $ ) - * &
5 2
1
5 2 &
-- (
( -
)' ( F2
0*# 0*$- - )'
'(
" #
0, &'(' ) (* 6 - + . )
*+,- - ' '
/+/#,/0+ 1
2 03 " 4
) 04 ") ' ) '
" # $
)' ) )' < ';
) ,0/#,/0+ 0* >
))' 0# )) ( ( :- ( ?) ')
) !
" #
$( ) )/#0,,//42
'
)) )))- .
))
( )
' '
' ) ) )- 9))- ' .
: = 9 )'@
) ') )
)) 2 2 )
) ) .
2 )
" # $>) '9))- 2
( ('': - ,#00,//+1
2 #3
)( ' '
" $
) 0$ > <
.
)' 7) ( ) )
0*#103- - & ) )
) )) ( C9) )
'
) ?
( ) '' ) .
) '
)
) ( ' ) ' ) ( '
) )9>
> - < ' ) ' ? 9> @ 4/8> -) > ( ) )7) ) ,/0* <
0*#- - ( :
E)
:' :- 0*#- -( 40/4,/0$F (
" ,808/$,/0$9>" 0*, 00/8,/0$ G@ 48A@*,8 > - 9> " #* 0$/*,/08 G@ *#+@48A@**8@#00@#/$@*,*@4*@,/0> - (
( ( ) ' < '
@) <) ( ' ' <) .
'
<
0*# - - '
(
:
E)
:' :-
'
) '" 0
0*#- -<
)' )( ( )
)
)
" 8
< '
0*# - - ' " 48A0 ,//+ :
E)
:' :-
' = '> ' <
0*#- - .
0*# - - )
( < ' (
)( () ) ) > ( 'E
( ' < ) ( ' <
0*#- - > (
' <
0*#@0*$- - ) .
:
) .
7( " 4,#@4/+ 7
" *4/ 7 " 0+#0@0**$ 0+#4@0**8 0+##@0**+ 0**A 0*#/ ,/0*
= ' <
0*#- -)) " 48A0 ,//+ ) :
E)
:' :- > (
1 3 ) .
" ?) ;
) ) ' < ) .
)' < '
)?) ' ) ' (
) :
E):- '
:
E)- 9)
H 08 > ) ' ) ( )
)' " 4 - (
( ) '' ) ( )
( - ( '
) ) ' ) < ) ( ' ) ) ( 9> < '
" +
0+ >
'
?- * &
8 9
0*# 0*$- - ) "0/B00
C0/ 0*# 0*$ - ) ?
0*#
)( )) '
?()2 (
0*#
- ' ?) ' )) () 0*# - ) ' 2 '
?(
) ) ( ) )(
) '
( - ? ) 0*#1*3 - )' ) 2 'I)2 (
)' ' )' ') (
)
)(
;
-)
) -) (
)
' 0*$ -
)'>
(' '
@
'?
0*# 0*$
) ' ) ' 0*$ -
(
)
0*# -
'
))
(
' I
) '
( ''- )-
( ) )'
'
D) & ( D) >0A+/ - ,*,? - ()
" A
)) 0*# 0*$
-
) ( )<)
') 0*$ -
0*# >
2 0*# - 2 )
)' ) )
? ( - )
) 0*$ )' ) )
'
0*#
- )?
)
0*# <
0*$
0*#@0*$ )''
) )) '-
) H
11. The learned counsel for the petitioner has also relied upon Swiam Sunder and others v. The State of Rajasthan and others, 1986(1) All India Criminal LR 311, and Sharafat Ali Khan and another v. Abdul Latif and others, 1987(1) All India Criminal LR 81, while the counsel for the respondent has relied upon Karnail Singh v. The State of Punjab, 1995(1) Recent CR 659. The basic principle in this regard has been settled by the Supreme Court in the case of Thunamal alias Devandas v. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others, AIR 1988 Supreme Court 1973, by stating that the findings of a civil court are binding upon a court exercising criminal jurisdiction.
Where civil suits are pending normally the court of the Magistrate should not permit continuation of the proceedings under Sections 145 and 146 of the Code and pass orders which may be in conflict with the orders passed ultimately by the civil court, but in a given situation and keeping in view the imminent threat to the breach of the peace or an emergency the Magistrate would be well within his jurisdiction to permit continuation of proceedings and pass the order with a limited purpose of meeting the exigencies of the situation and till rights are determined by a civil court of competent jurisdiction or any orders are passed by such civil court. All the authorities afore stated fully fortify this consistent view taken by all courts.
In the present case nothing else has been done by the learned Sessions Judge except that he has permitted the property to be protected through Joint Receivers of responsibility and status, that too till the time appropriate orders are passed by the civil courts where the matters are substantially in issue in the present proceedings are pending for determination.
" 0/
proceedings has obtained any injunction order which could be stated to be in conflict with the orders passed by learned Sessions Judge." 0A ? ( ) ))'-
)
0*# 0*$- - '
( '
) ( ' - ) -
' ())())( (
()
2
)) ' - )-
' '- ) - ,/ > ) )) )' ) 2 (
) (< ) 6 )
' ) ' ) ) < .
)) ))' '- ) ,0 ' )
)
'
) > 7
8 9 ' )'
'- ) - (
0*# - -()':
E) -
- ,, > ! "# 7
8 9 ( '- ) () ):
E) -
" 00
) )( ' (
) )
0*#- -( ) ) :
E) - ) )' ( )
) ) ' () '
)
'- )-
0*#- - ) )) (
- )-
.
)()) ( - )- ( ) ,4 > ' ) - ,#00,//+ 1
2 #3 ' 2
)) '( ( )' ) ' 2 )
" '))- ) :
E) - ) ! "# 7
8 9 )( ' ( ) )
0*#- - ( ) ) ,* > (
% *7
8 9 ) )
( ( :
E) - )
0*#- -
) () ) (
,4 > (
-
()) ' " 45 )
" 0,
-%,1 5 / %#(+
I< @ !@"
I ) !@"
" 04