Mamta Sharma And ORS. v. State Of Punjab And ANR.




    
    

 Date of decision: 1st October, 2015  Mamta Sharma and another  Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another  Respondents        !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Harish Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Gurveer Sidhu, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab.

 !
"#  $ Report dated 28.07.2015 of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Zira has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant Sher Mandhir and the accused persons namely Mamta Sharma, Tejpal and Ved Parkash, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure.

Heard.

RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.10.05 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, being a pure counterblast to the matrimonial case, and the offences for which the accused has been hauled up are not of serious nature together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the parties and in view of the law laid down in %&'( !&()* + !,',-  .(/'0 '(1 '(,*-2  #3$   #2&4&('5$ 36 and %7.58&(1-2 !&()* '(1 ,*-29 + !,',-  .(/'0 '(1 '(,*-2  #6$   #2&4&('5$  " the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.174 dated 11.09.2014 registered at Police Station Zira, District Ferozepur under Sections 420/120<B IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR are quashed.

The petition stands allowed in those terms.

#  !
$   :,0-2 "


 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.10.05 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court