Rakesh v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M No. 22802 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 23.8.2017 ...

Rakesh ................Petitioner vs.

State of Haryana .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan Present: Mr. Virender Soni, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Gaurav Bansal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. ...

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral) It is stated by counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has since joined the investigation. This fact is conceded by the State counsel, who in addition to that has stated that petitioner is not required for further investigation. He has stated so on instructions from HC Zile Singh, Police Station Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar. It being so, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order 11.7.2017, is made absolute, subject to fulfillment of conditions under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.

In that way, the petition is allowed.

( H.S. Madaan ) Judge 23.8.2017 chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No Banita Chugh 2017.08.23 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh