Sham Lal & ANR v. State Of Punjab & ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRM-M-23715-2016 Date of Decision:- 08.09.2016 Sham Lal and another ....Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and another ....Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present:
Mr. R.K. Girdhar, Advocate for the petitioners.
Ms. Anmol Grewal, DAG, Punjab.
None for respondent No.2.
**** RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since the FIR in question has been quashed, therefore, the present petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such. In this view of the matter, the instant petition is dismissed, as having become infructuous.
September 08, 2016 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Naresh Kumar 2016.09.16 15:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh