Maya And ANR v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-15827-2021 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-15827-2021 Date of Decision: 06.10.2021 Maya and another ...... Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana ......... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH Present :

Mr. Jangvir Singh Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Munish Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

***** AMOL RATTAN SINGH, J. (ORAL) By this petition, the petitioners seek the concession of 'anticipatory bail' under the provisions of Section 438 Cr.P.C., upon FIR No.23, dated 23.01.2021, having been registered at Police Station Chandhut, District Palwal, alleging therein the commission of offences punishable under Sections 148, 149, 323, 427, 452 and 506 of the IPC, with Section 379-B of the IPC added subsequently in the FIR. Learned State counsel, on instructions from H.C Pawan Kumar, who is present in Court to assist him, submits that the petitioners have joined investigation pursuant to the order dated 24.08.2021 and presently their custodial interrogation is not required.

In view of above, the interim order dated 24.08.2021 passed by VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2021.10.11 12:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-15827-2021 -2this court is made absolute, on the same terms and conditions. However, if the petitioners' custodial interrogation is required at any stage hereinafter, in the context of the FIR in question, they would be given 7 days notice before arrest, duly shown to be served upon them. Naturally, if the complainant is aggrieved in any manner, of lack of proper investigation, he/she would be always at liberty to avail of his/her remedy as per law.

The petition is disposed of accordingly.

(AMOL RATTAN SINGH) JUDGE 06.10.2021 adhikari Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2021.10.11 12:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document