Bharti v. Ravinder
TA-345-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.108 TA-345-2024 Date of Decision: 22.01.2025 BHARTI ....Applicant
Versus
RAVINDER SAINI .....Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Ms. Rinki K. Singhania, Advocate for the applicant.
Respondent proceeded against ex parte vide order dated 13.01.2025.
***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
!
"#
" ! $%#& !' % & %
( )
* !
% !
+
It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the marriage between the parties to the lis, had taken place on 13.07.2016, but no child was born from the said wedlock. However, due to the matrimonial discord, the parties are residing separate. The applicant has filed the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C., as well as the complaint under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, which are pending in the Sonu 2025.01.22 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
TA-345-2024 Courts at Rewari and the respondent is making appearance in both the said cases. Also, it is submitted that the applicant is not working and as such, has no independent source of earning. In these circumstances, it is difficult for her to commute a distance of about 155 kilometres, to defend the divorce petition.
In view of the aforesaid fact situation and also considering the position of law about preference to be given to the convenience of the wife in the transfer applications relating to the matrimonial dispute, the transfer application is allowed and
!
"#
" ! % $%#& !' !
& %
( ) , "
"# $%#& !' ! - '!)
+ - '!) ! $%#& !) ./ ! " $%#& !) ! %
%
#
(ARCHANA PURI) 22.01.2025 JUDGE Himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes Whether reportable :
Yes/No Sonu 2025.01.22 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document