Avtar Singh v. Balwinder Singh

RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

(102) RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M)

Reserved on: 18.03.2026

Pronounced on: 30.03.2026 Uploaded on: 06.04.2026 Avtar Singh (since deceased) through LRs.

...Appellant

Versus

Balwinder Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Argued by: Mr. Amit Jain, Senior Advocate with Ms. Nikita Sharma,Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Sandeep K. Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Vermani, Advocate for the respondent nos. 2 to 4.

*****

RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 2

RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 3

RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 4

RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 5

RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 6

RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 7 A careful consideration of the judgments of the Courts below shows that the findings recorded therein are based on proper appreciation of the evidence on record. No material evidence has been ignored, nor has any misreading of evidence been demonstrated. The conclusions arrived at are reasonable

RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 8 and do not suffer from perversity or illegality. In view of the foregoing discussion, it is evident that the appellant has failed to make out any case for interference. The findings recorded by the Courts below are concurrent, wellreasoned and based on evidence, and no ground is made out to disturb the same.

17. Accordingly, the present Regular Second Appeal is dismissed and the judgments and decrees passed by the Courts below are affirmed.

18. Since the main appeal stands decided, all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 30.03.2026 Saurav Pathania (i) Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No (ii) Whether reportable : Yes/No