Tulsi Ram v. Sukh Dayal

2023:PHHC:148889

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

RSA-1930-1995 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.11.2023 Tulsi Ram and another .... Appellants

Versus

Sukhdial .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - Mr. Ritesh Aggarwal, Advocate for Ms. Hemani Sarin, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. G.S. Jaswal, Advocate for the respondent. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The matter has come up for hearing after the year 1995. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellants submits that as per written instructions dated 10.08.2023, received from Balraj Singh S/o Sardar Singh-appellant No. 2 herein, the matter has been compromised between the parties; and, therefore, prays that the instant appeal may be disposed of, as having been rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the respondent does not deny the aforesaid fact and submits that other litigation between the parties i.e. CWP Nos. 2806 and 2830 of 1986, have also been disposed of, in view of compromise effected between the parties.

In view of the above, the instant regular second appeal is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 22.11.2023 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2023.11.23 11:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment