Raj Kumar @ Rakhu v. State Of Punjab

Crl. Misc. No. M-23985 of 2016 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-23985 of 2016 Date of Decision: 12.08.2016 Raj Kumar @ Rakhu ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. K.S.Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. P.S.Paul, DAG, Punjab.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J(ORAL) The petitioner is seeking regular bail in FIR No. 11 dated 22.2.2016 registered at Police Station Talwara, District Hoshiarpur under Sections 363, 366-A IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is in custody since 23.2.2016 and challan has been filed. Counsel urges that the allegations against the petitioner are that the main accused Hardeep had enticed the girl and had taken her away with the help of the petitioner. Counsel urges that the allegation is that Hardeep had used the vehicle owned by the petitioner. The petitioner runs a taxi service. The investigation is over.

Without commenting anything on the merits of the case and considering the fact that the trial will take time to conclude, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing local surety and adequate bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.08.12 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-23985 of 2016 -2Magistrate.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE August 12, 2016 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.08.12 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh