Saroj And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CRWP No. 3396 of 2021 Date of Decision: 30.11.2021 Saroj and another ......Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Manjeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Saurabh Girdhar, AAG, Haryana.

**** SURESHWAR THAKUR , J.

(ORAL) 1.

The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus hence directing the official respondents to give protection to the life and liberty of the petitioners, and also against any interference in the peaceful life of the petitioners being made at the behest of the private respondents. 2.

The learned State Counsel, does not have any objection, to an order being made by this Court to respondents concerned, to look into and decide through a speaking order, representation Annexure P-5. Consequently, this Court directs respondents concerned, to within three weeks hereafter, hence decide Annexure P-5, through a speaking order. 4.

Petition is disposed of.

5.

A copy of this order be given dasti on payment of usual charges. (SURESHWAR THAKUR) JUDGE November 30, 2021 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

Yes/No GURPREET SINGH 2021.11.30 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh