Ajay Mittal Alias Ajay Kumar v. U.T. Chandigarh

CRM-M-14931-2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-14931-2022 Date of decision: 25.04.2022 Ajay Mittal @ Ajay Kumar

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

UT Chandigarh

...Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Mr. Raghav Gulati, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Kuldeep Tiwari, APP. UT, Chandigarh.

Mr. Anorag Arora, Advocate for the complainant.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

Vide order dated 08.04.2022, this Court had granted interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been compromised between the parties.

Learned counsel for complainant does not refute the contention raised on behalf of the UT, Chandigarh.

Learned APP appearing for UT Chandigarh has filed reply in Court which is taken on record. He has opposed the bail on the ground that investigation is in progress and the petitioner be directed to join investigation as and when called for. In the entirety of facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is allowed. The order dated 8.4.2022 is hereby made absolute. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE April 25, 2022 AK Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

ASHWANI KUMAR 2022.04.27 12:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document