Arshad And ORS v. State Of Haryana

Crl. Misc.-M No. 23266 of 2014 -1- In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc.-M No. 23266 of 2014 Date of Decision: 13.2.2015.

Arshad and another ......Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA

Present:

Mr. Salim Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioners.

Ms. Dimple Jain, AAG, Haryana.

**** SABINA, J.

Learned counsel for petitioners has submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition to enable petitioners to take up all the pleas available to them during trial. Dismissed as withdrawn.

However, personal appearance of the petitioners before the Trial Court, during trial, shall remain exempted subject to the following conditions:- i.

petitioners shall be represented through counsel; ii.

shall not delay/stall the trial proceedings;

iii.

shall not dispute their identity as accused;

iv.

shall have no objection if the prosecution evidence is recorded in their absence but in the presence of their counsel;

GURPREET SINGH 2015.02.16 16:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Crl. Misc.-M No. 23266 of 2014 -2v.

shall appear before the Trial Court as and when required by the Trial Court;

vi.

any other condition which the learned Trial Court may impose.

(SABINA) JUDGE February 13, 2015 Gurpreet GURPREET SINGH 2015.02.16 16:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh