Sonia v. State Of Haryana & ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-23286 of 2014 Date of Decision:- 05.01.2015 Sonia ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others ....Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present:
Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Ram Kumar Yadav, D.A.G., Haryana for the State.
Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 to 4.
**** MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR , J.(oral) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.2 to 4 has stated that the petitioner has already been granted the concession of regular bail in this case. In this view of the matter, once the petitioner was allowed regular bail, then the petition for cancellation of anticipatory bail become infructuous, which is hereby dismissed as such, as prayed for. January 05, 2015 (MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR) naresh.k JUDGE NARESH KUMAR 2011.02.11 13:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh