High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/2414/2016dismissed

Raj Madaan And ANR v. State Of Haryana And ANR

2024-09-191 pages

2024:PHHC:124419

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-2414 of 2016 DATE OF DECISION :- 19.09.2024 Raj Madaan and another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and another

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present:- Mr. Nikhil Vats, Advocate for Mr. Dinesh Arora, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Ankita Ahuja, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Sidakmeet Sandhu, Advocate for respondent No. 2. *** SUMEET GOEL , J.

(Oral) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous in view of the judgment dated 13.09.2024 passed by the concerned trial Court. Ordered accordingly.

(SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE 19.09.2024 P.Singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARVINDER SINGH 2024.09.19 17:57 I agree to specified portions of this document chandigarh