Ravinder Parbhakar v. State Of Punjab And Others

   

      


        





  



 !

  



 "  

        

  # $ 

% &'

$



"

   #



 $ '

$%'

!

 #

 

( '

$

 # $ &  

'

$

  "   ) *    !"

# + ,

"  

& -

"

 

 

 &    $ &  . 

 

  /

  



-









   0  "   )+ * 

 ("&1 -

  

 2+ 3$ 4

+5 "

  1

&

    & # 0 

 (
&&  '

& 



7

'

  

   

  "   )+

 

  '

 

 "



"

0   

 "  

 

 8+9 3$ 4

5 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if the representation (Annexure P-3) of the petitioner is decided by respondent No.2 by passing a speaking order in a time bound manner. 3.

Learned State counsel as well as counsel appearing on behalf of respondent(s)-State and respondents No.2 & 3, respectively, submit that they have no objection in case a direction is issued to respondent No.2 for timeNEHA 2026.03.07 11:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

$%&'(%(& %% bound consideration and decision of the representation of the petitioner by passing a speaking order.

4.

Therefore, in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent No.2 is directed to consider the representation (Annexure P-3) of the petitioner and pass a speaking order, after affording him an opportunity to be heard, within a period of 01 month from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereof shall be conveyed to the petitioner. Needless to say, if the petitioner is found entitled to t

 &  0

'

 (



&& 

0 

 

-

1  " 

) 9 "  '

0&1

"  #  

(&()(&   

 "

0.

   :

.) 

  "

&

 :

.) NEHA 2026.03.07 11:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document