Sunita Devi v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-23280 of 2015 Date of Decision:20.7.2015 Sunita Devi --Petitioner.

Vs.

State of Haryana --Respondent.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK Present : Mr. Arun Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK J. (ORAL) Petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in FIR No.259 dated 15.5.2015 under Section 20 of the NDPS Act, registered at Police Station Sadar, Bahardurgarh, District Jhajjar. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner as well as her husband have been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that husband of the petitioner was arrested at the spot. Petitioner had no role to play in the present case. He concluded by submitting that since no case under Section 20 of the NDPS Act is made out against the petitioner, she deserves the concession of anticipatory bail. He prays for allowing the present petition.

AMIT KUMAR 2015.07.20 16:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-23280 of 2015 Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner at considerable length, after careful perusal of the record of the case and giving thoughtful consideration to the arguments advanced, this Court is of the considered opinion that in the given fact situation of the present case, petitioner has not been found entitled for concession of anticipatory bail. It is so said, because allegations against the petitioner are direct and specific. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.

Permission is granted.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

(RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) JUDGE 20.7.2015 AK Sharma AMIT KUMAR 2015.07.20 16:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document