High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/14399/2023disposed of

Sachin v. State Of Haryana

2023-04-20Mr. Justice Namit Kumar1 pages

CRM-M-14399-2023 207-2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-14399-2023 Date of decision: 20.04.2023 Sachin

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR

Present:

Mr. Ankur Sheoran, Advocate for Mr. Jay Prakash Jangu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. S.K. Tripathi, Advocate for the complainant. *** NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the present petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case bearing FIR No.400 dated 16.10.2022 under Sections 147/148/149/323/365/120-B/506 of IPC, 1860 and Sections 25(1-B) (a)/27(1)/29(b) of the Arms Act, 1959, registered at Police Station Kherki Daula, District Gurugram.

Learned State counsel has filed the status report/reply dated 19.04.2023 which is taken on record. Copy thereof has been supplied to the counsel for the petitioner.

Vide order dated 21.03.2023 while granting interim protection, the petitioner was directed to join investigation. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that pursuant to order dated 21.03.2023, petitioner has joined the investigation and as such his interim bail may be made absolute. The learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Vikram Singh has affirmed the fact that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his further investigation in the present case is not required. In view of the above, interim order dated 21.03.2023 is made absolute subject to compliance of conditions as envisaged under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.

The present petition stands disposed off.

(NAMIT KUMAR) 20.04.2023 JUDGE Parveen kumar Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable :Yes/No PARVEEN KUMAR 2023.04.22 06:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document