Rinki And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 2024:PHHC:038837 CRWP-2582-2024 Date of decision: March 19th, 2024 Rinki and another .....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others .....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

Present:

Mr. Sankalp Gehlawat, Advocate for the petitioners.

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL , J. (ORAL) Prayer in the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of directions to respondents No.1 to 3, to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners, who apprehend threat to their life at the hands of private respondent No.4, who is stated to be the father of petitioner No.1.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1, aged 18 years and petitioner No.2, aged 28 years, got married on 13.03.2024, against the wishes of family members of petitioner No.1, arrayed as respondent No.4. Ever since then, the petitioners are being threatened with dire consequences by the private respondents. Resultantly, a representation dated 15.03.2024 (Annexure P-2) was also made to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Bhiwani, for protection of their life and liberty but in vain. Learned counsel submits that he would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2Superintendent of Police, Bhiwani, to look into their representation (Annexure P-2) and take appropriate steps at the earliest. PUNEET SACHDEVA 2024.03.19 15:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRWP-2582-2024 -23.

Notice of motion to official respondents only. 4.

On asking of the Court, Ms. Trishanjali Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents.

5.

In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with directions to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Bhiwani, to look into the representation dated 15.03.2024 (Annexure P-2) qua the alleged threat perception and take necessary steps, as may be required, in accordance with law, to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondent. However, this direction will not validate the marriage said to have taken place between the parties and will have no effect on any civil or criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with law.

March 19th, 2024 (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2024.03.19 15:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh