Mohit v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-23458 of 2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM-M-23458 of 2017 Date of Decision: 17.07.2017 Mohit ....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Ravi Malik, Advocate for the petitioner.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.177 dated 27.05.2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 323, 452, 506, 420 and 482 of Indian Penal Code (for short, "IPC") at Police Station Chandhut, District Palwal. Heard.

Notice of motion.

On asking of the court, Mr. Amrik Narwal, DAG, Haryana, who is present in the Court accepts notice and submits that intimation by Registry informing of fixation of the petition has already been received and record of the case is available with him.

As per amicable settlement of the dispute between parties, coaccused, namely, Chanchal and Yogesh were allowed regular bail vide order dated 07.07.2017 passed in CRM-M-23041-2017.

Applying the principle of parity with aforesaid co-accused, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks regular bail for the petitioner. Jitender Kumar 2017.07.18 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-23458 of 2017 -2In view of above and applying the principle of parity but without expressing any opinion on merits of the case and keeping in view the fact that conclusion of trial will take considerably long time, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner-Mohit is ordered to be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bond and surety bond to the satisfaction of concerned trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, subject to following terms:- (a) The petitioner shall comply with the conditions mentioned in Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

(b) In the event of his absence on any date of hearing, the benefit of bail allowed to the petitioner shall stand withdrawn. The trial Court shall be competent to cancel his bail bond and surety bond and proceed to procure his presence in accordance with law. In that eventuality the petitioner shall have to apply for bail afresh. (c) He shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the Court.

July 17, 2017 ( SURINDER GUPTA ) jk JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Jitender Kumar 2017.07.18 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH