Onkar Singh And Nar. v. State Of Punjab And ANR.




    
     

 Date of decision: 24th September, 2015  Onkar Singh and another

Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another

Respondents     !"  #
  #
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Naveen Batra, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. J.S. Brar, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab.

 #
$% "& Report dated 28.08.2015 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Garhshankar has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant Amarjit Singh alias Siri and the accused persons namely Onkar Singh and Happy Mahi, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is genuine and has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure.

Heard.

RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.24 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



  In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, the fact that parties belong to the same very village and the offences for which the accused have been hauled up are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the parties and in view of the law laid down in '()* #(*+, - #.)./   0*1)2 )*3 )*.,/4! 

%&   %4(5(*)6&  and '7068(*3/4 #(*+, )*3 .,/49 - #.)./   0*1)2 )*3 )*.,/4! 

 %&   %4(5(*)6&

$ the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.56 dated 11.07.2012 registered at Police Station Mahilpur, District Hoshiarpur under Sections 323/324/148/149/326/34 IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR are quashed. The petition stands allowed in those terms.

%  #
&   #/:./52/4$


 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.24 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court