M/S Garg And Company v. State Of Haryana And Others

  


 


 
 
 

  










 !

"
#$$ M/S GARG AND COMPANY  

 



 







 
%

 &'
%$
(


)


($
* +++++
  



!"
# $!
%
&
  


#
! "

'
!

(!

!
%
&
 

)))))
)


($
*,
$
-./0 &
 !



&!
*
%
+
 $
,,-.,,/
%
&
+
%
1 !
%
&
+!

$
%
!
2 

&
!+ 
%
3!

!3+
$ 4
&
 

$
&
  !
!
566,6,
3 #
*(
&
 
7

8+ 
 9
:!


$ + 
!!

4

*&!%
%
&
 
$  
&!
&
 
2!
! 
#!

 +
*+ 4
2 
%
&
3*!!
0 $
*(
&
  !

3 
!


&
!
%
&
!
2 
!


3  

!

!
 ,
%
&
2 
 
&
!4 3 
3 2 
&
3 (

+$
 
3 (
% 3
&
+

4
*
;
+*<$

!
3!83+3
%
=>
%
&
!4 3 
!3 + 
&
!
!3 + 
$ +
*
$!3

$ 3
%
&
2
!



8 (
%
%$
!*(

-2- 2023:PHHC:050723  2# "

!
 !*
!
%
3 (

+ $  !
?!

'+!

!


&
 
!$$ 4(
+*3
!

!$!
% !
%
&
 
3 (
!

0!+
@
%
&
!4 3 
!
566,6,
 2# "

$
&!
*
! 
& +
*(
&
+  4

4  

The petitioner contends that similar clause was also incorporated in the other contracts executed by him pertaining to construction of ITI at Shahabad in District Kurukshetra. A similar request was made there and the same was declined. The petitioner filed CWP22685-2021 which was decided vide judgement dated 16.03.2023. :!


$ + 
!!

4

*&!%
%
&
 
$  
&!
&
2 +
*
!%
!
&
<+ $+ 

$!
&
 
 =

+  4
4  "
3*!!
0 $"
+*$
A 
!

3 "
?
;
"
3*!!
0!



 $


 
&
  ! 
!
566,6,
!



!
!
! 
!


!  4

& +

!
3
* + 
3!

 !%
$  4
&
4!
  

 $
%
3  


#
! "

'
!

(!

!
!!


!


!$$

$

*&!%
%
 
!


&!

*<$

&
# 
&
!* #
 !(
%
&
 

!$$

$$ 4("
&
  


 
%
2&
$  
%
&
!


!


2& +
$ 33  4

&
3 
%
&
$!3"
2&
!
$

 
 = +  4
4  "
3*!!
0 $"
+*$
A 
!

3 "
?
;
"
3*!!
0!



8!3 
&
4 #!

$
 +
*(
&
 

&
  !
!
566,6,
!



!
!
! 
!


!  4

& +
2&
!
  
%
65
3 &

-3- 2023:PHHC:050723 %
&
$
%
$ %
$ (
%
&

!%
!%% 4
!

 + (
%
&!

4

&
$#
!



&


!$$ 4(
 
%


-)


($
*0

%
#,





   A&&
!  4.

! 

.
A&&
 !*

.