Niyaj Mohd v. State Of Haryana

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH


CRM-M-12930-2026 Decided on: 10.03.2026
  

......Petitioner
Versus


  ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA

Present:

Mr. Sarfaraj Anjum




 
 


 
 

 



****
SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral)



  




  
!"#
 $%
#&#'

(
 

   




)*+
%,!
 
&-&#&#.


  
!/,
!/"
!#&

#&0$
*12
"/&
32


  
''"
''/3#4
'"3!4
/

$  
%
  
3$%4
#&#'4





1
  
%



% 
 
#

 





5
0


5

5 






5
5







6 6



5








6 6 
6

&"&##&-

0


6 



 4

-2-
'

 

  



5



5 





6


6 

 


 


5 







 6 8


 
9

 



 









 
   







:



 
!
% 
6 

.
*




  
 
 


 
 
 



 


 


  0  /
 
;6


 



 


6





2


( 


 



 




    


5

6 




 








8
 
  6

5
5
 


6

5

 
+ 
3+4

 




 

 







6






 








6
;
  
1 
76 
26

&"&##&-


6



6


5




7.

Learned counsel for the State submitted that to defeat the right of the owner, a forged and fabricated agreement to sell and other

-3-
documents were forged which shows that the petitioner and the coaccused has no fear of law and presented these forged and fabricated documents before the Court by way of filing of a civil suit for specific performance.




< 

 


 

 
 

( 6

5  

6

 and hence, prays for dismissal of the present petition seeking anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
"
 -




 5

9
  6 





  





 





5 





 
 6


 
 




 6

5

 
+  3+4

1
  
%



%

 









 6 


 







(
 
 

  
 

  6 




  


 


< 





 


 
 
 6  
 
5  
=
6








 






 
*

    

 
  
   
 

>

 

2

6 ?

6 
 


 


6


 6 

 
6


6



6




 




5 

5 0 

 

-4-
   

5





 
6

  


6

 
&
*
 5
  


  







  


11.

Nothing observed herein shall be construed as 
@





2


6


:  
(SUBHAS MEHLA)
JUDGE
10.03.2026
Sonia Puri Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES/NO
Whether Reportable:

YES/NO