High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/23593/2017allowed

Saroj Devi v. State Of Haryana

2017-08-09Mr. Justice Harinder Singh Sidhu2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-23593 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 09, 2017 Smt.Saroj Devi

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.Pawan Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr.B.S.Virk, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.233 dated 17.06.2017 under Sections 186, 323, 353, 427 and 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar Sonepat, District Sonepat.

Notice of motion was issued. Learned State counsel appeared and contested the petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. From the perusal of the FIR, I find that no active role has been attributed to the present petitioner. As per prosecution version, when the Vineet Gulati 2017.08.10 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh complainant Satish Goyat, SDO, UHBVNL along with other persons went

CRM No.M-23593 of 2017 -2to check the theft of electricity, then other co-accused abused and scuffled with them and also caused damage to the Government vehicle. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and without discussing the facts of the case in minute details and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case, where petitioner is entitled to benefit of anticipatory bail. Therefore, present petition is allowed. It is ordered that in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail subject to her furnishing personal bonds and surety to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. However, she shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so and shall abide by the conditions as provided under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. August 09, 2017 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Vineet Gulati 2017.08.10 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh