Khushpreet Singh & ORS v. State Of Punjab And ANR
!"# $%&%!' ()(
*+(, -
!
"
#
$% & ''''
-.(/0 12 ( )# !#
*
+,$--.& -/-0%-(1
2-.
&0% 2%& 2%2 (&/ (&3,4
5 )
66 % %3-0%-%2
!
!8
! " "#
$ %$ "&%'!
"
() ! $%
! *! $ ! "
& +(),-+(.() "
! /
"0 +-
"0 +11
$%
%
0 2
* !
$
3*
2 1(-(.() /
3*
2
!
$ 0
/!
!
4+ 1 $ /
5*& (6 /
) 3
6
/!
/
7
$
(89(.() !
/$
$/ "
/ $
3*
2
:
2 6 9
( 4 : ! %--.%-%2
! : 4
!8 &
$
+ ;1< 5 / = >
" !?! $/
5*& ;(<" *
;)<*
1-) /
$ $
;< 5 $ $
$ !
/=
> " ! ?!
3
' % !
/!
/
;7<" *
/' % !
7 & $
/ /
:
& ; $% &6
66
+,
subsequent thereto against the petitioner is quashed.
5.
Learned State counsel does not dispute that though initially the FIR was registered under Section 307 IPC but during the investigation, offence punishable under Section 307 IPC stands deleted. Thus, the same would not be hit by the case of
1 , 4
# .
6 # <4
!"
#$% &
''&
& (#)* "
+ #$%+ &,'
- -
) -!.)
&/ - -
) '
)0..)/ 1 .% & &
! 6 6 #<4 4
;<
! 39( !
$/
)(. ;$< @ ! ! !
;
< ! 0
! $
2
A
$ !
! ! /
/
/
;< !
$ 0
/
/
/ ;<
9(
/
@
% !
*
/
@
" 0
@
!
2 5*&
).- / $ 5*&
@
% !
%
3 $ /3
!
;<
0 @
!
$ $ /
3
0
!
;< 6 2 5*& +
$ !
@
2
! !$
!
/ :
! 6
4
<
=&/%44 * +,8
;<
! 0
2 ; < ;<
;<
;< "
$
/
;< 3
! 3 4 *
#
! +,$--.& -/-0%-(1
2-.
&0% 2%& 2%2 (&/ (&3,4
5 )
66 %/-%%-(.>
<8&?
6 # *2
/ -2 ()(
@
= A @ $