← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/2366/2017dismissed

Chandan v. State Of Haryana

2017-04-06Mr. Justice Harinder Singh Sidhu2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-2366 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 06, 2017 Chandan

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.Kunal Dawar, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.2 dated 01.01.2016 under Sections 302 and 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Bhupani, District Faridabad. Notice of motion.

Mr.B.S.Virk, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and contested the petition. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. Police record is also available.

As per the allegations, Vijay Kumar (deceased) younger brother of the complainant, had gone to attend the duty and did not return to the home in the evening and after waiting for while night, search was made. Vineet Gulati 2017.04.07 15:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh Later on, complainant side got information that one dead body of young

CRM No.M-2366 of 2017 -2person was lying in a vacant plot, which was taken by the police in the mortuary. The dead body was identified by the complainant and others to be of Vijay Kumar.

As per learned State counsel, it is a case of circumstantial evidence. The present petitioner has not been named in the FIR. There is last seen and other evidence. PW-2 Narinder has already deposed against the accused before the learned trial Court and the trial is still going on. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case and in view of the nature and gravity of the offence, I do not find it a fit case where petitioner is entitled to benefit of regular bail. Therefore, finding no merit in the present petition, the same is dismissed.

April 06, 2017 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Vineet Gulati 2017.04.07 15:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh