Vipin v. State Of Haryana

Crl. Misc. No. M-24559 of 2016 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-24559 of 2016 Date of Decision: 13.12.2016 Vipin ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. M.S.Kathuria, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vikas Chopra, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Gautam Dutt, Advocate for respondent No. 2.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J (ORAL) Through the instant petition, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 59 dated 4.5.2016, registered under Sections 506 IPC and Section 10 of the POCSO Act, Police Station Women Police Station, District Palwal.

Counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the order dated 9.8.2016, passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation. State counsel states that the petitioner has joined the investigation.

Looking to the circumstances, but without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and order dated 9.8.2016 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute subject to the conditions laid Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.12.14 10:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-24559 of 2016 -2down in Section 438 Sub Section 2 Clauses (i)(ii) and (iii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with the rider that the petitioner will not contact the complainant or the minors in any manner and will not tamper with evidence. (ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE December 13, 2016 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.12.14 10:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh