Rajbir Kaur And Another v. State Of Punjab And Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH 2024:PHHC:038909 CRWP-2565-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: March 19th, 2024 Rajbir Kaur and another .....Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others .....Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
Present:
Ms. Manisha Kumari, Advocate for the petitioners.
MANJARI NEHRU KAUL , J. (ORAL) Prayer in the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of directions to the official respondents, to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners, who apprehend threat to their life at the hands of private respondents No.4 to 7, who are stated to be family members of petitioner No.1. 2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1, aged 22 years and petitioner No.2, aged 26 years, got married on 15.03.2024, against the wishes of family members of petitioner No.1, arrayed as respondents No.4 to 7. Ever since then, the petitioners are being threatened with dire consequences by the private respondents. Resultantly, a representation dated 15.03.2024 (Annexure P-4) was also made to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Batala, District Gurdaspur, for protection of their life and liberty but in vain. Learned counsel submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Batala, District Gurdaspur, to look into their representation PUNEET SACHDEVA 2024.03.19 15:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
CRWP-2565-2024 (O&M) -2- (Annexure P-4) and take appropriate steps at the earliest. 3.
Notice of motion to official respondents only. 4.
On asking of the Court, Mr. Amit Rana, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents.
5.
In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with directions to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Batala, District Gurdaspur, to look into the representation dated 15.03.2024 (Annexure P-4) qua the alleged threat perception and take necessary steps, as may be required, in accordance with law, to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents. However, this direction will not validate the marriage said to have taken place between the parties and will have no effect on any civil or criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with law.
March 19th, 2024 (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes Whether reportable :
No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2024.03.19 15:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh