High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/24734/2016allowed

Rohit Sharma v. State Of Haryana

2016-09-07Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg2 pages

CRM-M-24734-2016 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-24734-2016 Date of Decision:- 07.09.2016 Rohit Sharma ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Mahima Yashpal, AAG, Haryana.

**** RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, in a case arising out of FIR No.324 dated 08.06.2016, registered at Police Station Sohna, District Gurgaon, who has been booked for having committed the offences punishable under Sections 346 and 363A (Sections 341 and 376 IPC added later on).

At the very outset, learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Krishan Kumar, has informed that in pursuance of order dated 23.07.2016 of this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation on 27.08.2016 and his custodial interrogation is not required at this stage. Further, the cancellation report has also been prepared in the present matter. In view of the totality of the facts and circumstances of the Naresh Kumar 2016.09.09 15:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh case, order dated 23.07.2016, passed by this Court whereby the ad-interim

CRM-M-24734-2016 -2anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. September 07, 2016 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Naresh Kumar 2016.09.09 15:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh