Sidharth Sharma And ANR v. State Of Haryana And ANR.
!
"#$ !%$&'(' ) #*&# +$,-
./ 01 2 1
!
"
"#"
$ % &'
(
"
)% &'
(
"
"
*'
% +&,%
"
"
-./
% &'
(
"
-% &'
(
- "
"
2 1
-3,"45 "
0
(
/ (
/ .2 2
45 - "
""
%
( % % 6
5 / ( 7878% 7878
( / ( / 09 7'
& (8 &(% :1:
% ; &(;8 2 /( 5/9%
+( # .
// 93 (2 2
9
( "
"
& 45% 2' 92
( / / ( 9 ."
"
0 ) '
(9/ ' ( "
"
< :" "
%
) (
9
5//3 2=/ (
22 ( ) 2
( "
"
0 1""
(' 2 ( 2 % '
/ % )
( (
/ ( ANURADHA 2023.10.07 12:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
)
(( 7 8
9 (/
(/
"
6"
// $(
!
"#% /!
>"
The Supreme Court in Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others v. State of Gujarat and another, 2017 AIR (SC) 4843 laid down the broad principles governing the exercise of powers for quashing of FIR. It was held that the power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is to be exercised by the High Court to secure the ends of justice, to prevent abuse of any process of law and in cases where in view of the compromise the possibility of conviction is remote and continuation of proceeding will cause oppression and prejudice. 9.
The Supreme Court in Ramawatar v. State of Madhya Pradesh, 2021 SCC Online SC 966 in similar circumstances quashed the criminal proceedings on the basis of a voluntary compromise involving sections of the Act.
1"
0
2
"
With the intervention of friends and relatives, they have decided to forget the incident; forgive each other and proceed ahead in life. No useful purpose would be served by continuing with the trial. Due to compromise, there are bleak chances of conviction. To meet the ends of justice, the FIR mentioned above and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.
9.
The petition is allowed.
62 1
#*&# +$,- "
? .2= !
@ = -
"
? 9/ !
@ = -
ANURADHA 2023.10.07 12:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment