Jagmeet Singh @ Jaggi v. State Of Haryana

On 07.03.2026, this Court had passed the following order:- "The petitioner has fil Section 482 of Bharatiya Naga grant of anticipatory bail in registered under Section 21 Psychotropic Substances Act, Sirsa, District Sirsa.

Learned counsel for the that the petitioner is innocent a in the present case on the basis accused, namely Ranjeet Singh 86 milligram of 'heroin' was r above from the small quant disclosure statement of the c value in the eyes of law. He judgment of Hon'ble Suprem State of Tamil Nadu : 2021(4) led the instant petition under arik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for FIR No.15 dated 15.01.2026 (B) of Narcotic Drugs and 1985 at Police Station Sadar e petitioner, inter alia, submits and has been falsely implicated s of disclosure statement of coh @ Rana, from whom 6 gram recovered which is marginally tity. He further submits that co-accused has no evidentiary has placed reliance upon the me Court in Tofan Singh Vs.

SCC 1. He further submits PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.05.07 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

that the petitioner is not involved in any other case and is ready and willing to join the investigation.

Notice of motion.

Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, A.A.G., Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and seeks time to file status report.

Adjourned to 07.05.2026 In the meanwhile, arrest of the petitioner shall remain stayed. He shall join the investigation and co-operate with the investigating agency and shall not leave country without prior permission of this Court."

3.

Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the aforementioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur.

4.

Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Pawan Kumar affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. 5.

In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 07.03.2026 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.

6.

However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him.

PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.05.07 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.