Sandeep @ Matru v. State Of Haryana

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ......

Criminal Misc. No.M-12955 of 2019 .....

Date of decision:23.05.2019 Sandeep alias Matru

...Petitioner

v.

State of Haryana

...Respondent

....

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh .....

Present:

Mr. Akash Vashisth, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Navdeep Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.

.....

Inderjit Singh, J.

This petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.309 dated 6.12.2016 registered for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 323, 324 and 365 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act and, charged under Sections 302, 323, 324, 365 and 349 IPC, at Police Station Bawani Khera, District Bhiwani. Notice of motion has been issued in this case. Mr. Navdeep Singh, learned Assistant Advocate General, Haryana has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and contested this petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2019.05.24 16:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Cr. Misc. No.M-12955 of 2019 [2] From the record, I find that the present petitioner, though named in the FIR, has been found innocent during investigation and his name was kept in column No.2. Later on, he was summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C. to face the trial. In the FIR, no specific injury has been attributed to him. The only allegation against him is of catch hold. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, and in view of the fact that the petitioner was found innocent during investigation and has been summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C., I find that no useful purpose will be served by keeping him in custody till the final disposal of the case. Therefore, in view of the above, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

May 23, 2019.

(Inderjit Singh) Judge *hsp* NOTE:

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2019.05.24 16:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh