Ali Mohd v. State Of Haryana & ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.No.M-23978 of 2015 Date of Decision: January 11, 2016 Ali Mohammad
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana & Ors.
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present:
Mohd.Arshad, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.(Oral) Learned counsel contends that since the charge-sheet (challan) has been presented, therefore, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
January 11, 2016 (Naresh Kumar Sanghi) seema Judge SEEMA RANI 2016.01.11 17:07 I attest the accuracy and authencity of the document