Dharam Chand And ANR v. State Of Haryana & ANR




    
    

 Date of decision: 14th September, 2015  Dharam Chand and another  Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and another  Respondents        !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana for respondent No.1.

None for respondent No.2.

 !
"#  $ Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners Dharam Chand and Suresh Chander in case by way of Criminal Complaint No.6 dated 04.02.2014 under Sections 427/34 IPC read with Section 3(1)(iv) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 pending in the Court of ACJM, Rohtak. It is submitted that in compliance of the orders dated 24.07.2015 of this Court, petitioners Dharam Chand and Suresh RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.15 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   Chander have surrendered before the trial Court and have been allowed bail, in support of which contention certified copy of the order dated 31.07.2015 passed by the ACJM, Rohtak has been placed on record by learned counsel for the petitioners. In the light of what has been stated above, the interim bail granted to the petitioners vide order dated 24.07.2015 is made absolute and the petition stands disposed off accordingly subject to compliance under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

#  !
$   !%&'%()%* "


 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.15 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court