← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/7052/2024disposed of

Avinash Yadav v. Haryana Public Service Commission And Another

2024-03-22Mrs. Justice Lisa Gill,Mrs. Justice Amarjot Bhatti2 pages

CWP No. 7052 of 2024 (O&M) 2024:PHHC:041826-DB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.7052 of 2024(O&M) Date of Decision:22.03.2024 Avinash Yadav ......Petitioner

Versus

Haryana Public Service Commission and another ...... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI

Present:

Mr. Rajesh Arora, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Jatinder Pal Singh Gill, Advocate for Ms. Harpriya Khaneka, Advocate for respondent no.1.

Ms. Supriya Garg, Advocate for respondent no.2.

***** LISA GILL, J(Oral).

1.

Prayer in this writ petition is for directing respondent no.1 to "consider objections dated 08.03.2024 and 10.03.2024, Annexure P-11, against answer key uploaded on objection portal with respect to Preliminary Examination of Haryana Civil Services (JB) 2024 conducted on 03.03.2024 under the authority of respondents, pursuant to advertisement no.1/2024, Annexure P-1, issued by respondent no.1 and to direct respondent no.1 to issue revised answer key and to declare result considering the revised answer key;

AND Issuance of ad-interim direction to respondent no.1 to refrain from declaring result during the pendency of the present writ petition." SANJAY KHAN 2024.03.23 14:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP No. 7052 of 2024 (O&M) 2.

Learned counsel for respondents (on advance notice) submits that this writ petition is clearly premature and based only on some misplaced apprehensions of petitioner. Objections submitted by petitioner and other candidates are under consideration by the Expert Committee. Report of the Expert Committee would thereafter be placed before the Selection Committee, which shall consider the same and take necessary action, as may be required, including calling of, cross-objections, if necessary. 3.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances as above, we find that this writ petition is indeed premature and is disposed of accordingly. There is no expression of opinion on the merits of the matter. ( LISA GILL ) JUDGE (AMARJOT BHATTI) March 22, 2024.

JUDGE s.khan Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No.

Whether reportable :

Yes/No.

SANJAY KHAN 2024.03.23 14:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document